Beijing News (Reporter Zhang Jingzhang) The reporter from the Beijing News was informed that a few days ago, the Beijing Haidian District People’s Court tried a contract dispute between students and educational institutions.Xiaoli (pseudonym) signed three contracts with an educational and training institution, stipulating that the training institution provided her children with the college entrance examination guidance and paid 50,000 yuan in service fee.Frequent changes, poor service quality, and the arrangements arranged have not been fulfilled in accordance with the contract. In the later period, no one contacted Xiaoli.
According to the court, the court negotiated the “College Entrance Examination Volunteer Report Contract”, and the court did not have any objections.Regarding the “Contract of the Independent Selection of Schools and Big School”, both parties have not been fulfilled, and the relevant training costs should be refunded.Regarding the “Background Promotion Contract”, Xiaoli advocated that the certificate and report results submitted by the training institution did not meet the contract agreement, but the training institution also paid a certain amount of labor costs. Therefore, according to the actual performance of the contract, the service fee will be refunded more than 40,000 yuan.EssenceIn addition, Xiaoli did not support the fraudulent behavior of his claims, and the court did not support it.
The judge reminded that some college entrance examination education and training institutions in order to attract students to exaggerate, fictional facts or concealing the real situation, so that parents of students have entered into a contract based on their wrong understanding.Parents should retain evidence in a timely manner during the daily performance of the contract. If there is a fraud in the training institution, parents can claim three times compensation based on the Consumer Rights Protection Law.
Edit Liu Qian school pair Fu Chunzheng
Report/feedback
